|
Statistics of phasingMost useful indicators of the validity of a heavy-atom site are the real occupancy and the atomic thermal parameter(s). Reduction in RCullis when new site is added is also a good indicator. RCullis = <P-weighted lack of closure> / <Isomorphous difference> But for dmin > » 3.5Å occupancies and thermal parameters are highly correlated and the latter should probably not be refined. To judge a derivative as a whole, check RCullis and the phasing power. RCullis < » 0.6 are considered excellent, < » 0.9 usable. For anomalous data any RCullis is useful. Phasing power measures the sharpness of the phase distribution (contribution of derivative to phasing information compared with noise). Phasing power = <Heavy-atom amplitude> / <P-weighted lack of closure> > » 1.5 excellent, > » 1.0 good, > » 0.5 usable. Note that all root mean-square (RMS) averages are very sensitive to outliers: underestimates RCullis and phasing power, so straight means are safer. Check mean & standard deviation of absolute phase difference <|Df|> between FP & FH (N.B. not applicable in SIR[AS] cases). If data accurately scaled, phase of FP is uncorrelated with phase of FH. <|Df|> should be » 90° (±10°). s should be » 52° for acentric, » 90° for centric. Mean figure of merit measures precision of the "best" phase. <FOM> » mean of cosine(estimated phase error). |